Abstract
Although reciprocity is fundamental to all social orders, management research offers few reviews of the concept’s theoretical origins and current applications. To help bridge this gap, we elucidate the dominant understandings of reciprocity, ask which areas of research emerge from them, and explore how they interconnect. Our bibliometric methodology detects four clusters of management research on reciprocity. Across these clusters, authors subscribe mainly to substantialist ontology, marginalize morally oriented motives consistent with relational ontology, and largely assume that benefit-oriented motives underlie reciprocity. We outline the advantages of a moral-oriented relationalist concept of reciprocity and discuss potential areas for its development in management research.
Supplementary material
- Figure 3 expandedNetwork of bibliographic couplings of articles on reciprocity
License
Any party may pass on this Work by electronic means and make it available for download under the terms and conditions of the authorcontract.
Recommended citation
Göbel M, Vogel R, Weber C (2013). Management Research on Reciprocity: A Review of the Literature. BuR – Business Research, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 34-53, URN: urn:nbn:de:0009-20-36451
Please provide the exact URL and date of your last visit when citing this article.
Number of citations
Visit Google Scholar to find out, how often this paper is cited.
